Thousands of L.A. apartment owners say they’ve been hurt by the city’s rent freeze and will continue to suffer if it’s extended.
The Apartment Association of Greater Los Angele is fighting back, and has filed a lawsuit against the city of Los Angeles for the financial burden the rent freeze ordinance has caused housing providers.
The rent freeze began on March 30, 2020, but isn’t scheduled to end until Jan. 31. It prohibits landlords from increasing rent on units subject to the Rent Stabilization Ordinance in an attempt to provide renters with additional protections in response to Covid-19 – a period deemed financially stressful.
Ultimately, the rent freeze was established to prevent unnecessary housing displacement and to prevent individuals from falling into homelessness.
According to the association, the lawsuit seeks to nullify the ordinance, claiming it violates both the U.S. and California constitutions because it deprives landlords of due process.
Financial burden
Los Angeles County has undergone severe inflationary pressures in recent years, leaving landlords dependent on rent increases to keep their businesses alive. But with standstill rental prices despite inflation, combined with the city continuing to increase property taxes and contracts for utilities – such as water, power and trash – some housing providers are facing a loss of income.
“Property owners are underwater,” said Daniel Yukelson, executive director of the apartment association. According to Yukelson, the citywide loss of income as a result of the rent freeze equates to well over $2.6 billion.
“The rent freeze has certainly made it less profitable from an owners’ perspective,” Rosenthal said. “That money will never recover.”
The biggest grievance of the rent freeze that often goes overlooked is that many of these multifamily units have mortgages with adjustable interest rates, which property owners are financially responsible for.
When the interest rate goes to 7%, that’s a real pain. That’s uncollectable.
Landlords are (paying) out of pocket for tenants to live in their buildings.
According to association members, one of the biggest issues with the ordinance is the targeted nature of the government authority on a private enterprise, a mandate, they deem, exclusive to the rental market.
“No other type of business or entity – not food suppliers, medical professionals, nor the government itself – have been burdened by what will ultimately be a four-year mandated ‘freeze’ on income from which housing providers will never be able to make up,” Cheryl Turner, president of the apartment association’s board, said in a statement.
“At some point, if the interest rates were to continue (increasing) and freezes and other burdens are placed upon the shoulders of property owners, buildings might go back to the bank, values will diminish, or properties won’t get maintained the way they were once because they won’t have the ability to do it because they’ve gone on to service a debt,” Rosenthal said. “Property owners aren’t the bad guys here.”
According to the association’s members, the biggest goals with the lawsuit are to overturn the rent freeze, to prevent similar legislation from being passed in the future and to allow members to seek damages from the city.
The association has a hearing scheduled for next month. The city has not yet responded to the lawsuit.
Since the rent freeze ordinance began in March 2020, the association has filed multiple other lawsuits against the city, including suits against Measure ULA – a one-time real estate tax on multimillion-dollar real estate transfers – and the residential eviction moratorium, another form of protection the city provided in response to the pandemic forbidding landlords from evicting tenants who are unable to pay rent as a result of Covid-19. Both of these cases are still pending.